Guest review of an old classic.
As a literary experience I enjoyed this more than I expected to, it is written as journals and letters which was hard to adjust to but I eventually settled into it. Some sections seemed dreary and pointless until I realised that characters and relationships were being drawn up which became relevant later. The language is very different but again you settle into it eventually. Although we all think we know our Vampire theology it’s interesting taking a dive into the source material, all is not quite as Hammer Horror studios would have us believe... and it’s all good.
Given that this was published 1897 it’s odd to read a perspective of women twenty-one years before they could vote, Mina Harker is described as being blessed with a man's brain: methodical and analytical. With regard to her role in the plot it’s clear that the success of the effort was due to the combined mental efforts of Prof. Van Helsing and Mina Harker, something that is overlooked in any adaptation I have seen. I wonder if Mr Stoker was making a subtle point here, clearly it was too subtle.
If I were to level one criticism at the story it would be that the building to the inevitable clash with the count ended in a bit of an anti climax, as in ‘that went well‘.
Any relation to that dreadful film of 1992 is quite minor, they took the basic plot and some of the events but it is quite an insult to the book I think.
Review by Andy Pennington.
Other reviews by Andy: A Song of Achilles
Originally published: 26 May 1897
Shop at Amazon
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Reviews by Year of Publication
All 1866 1897 1932 1935 1942 1950 1953 1960 1962 1969 1971 1974 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1989 1991 1994 1995 1996 1997 2001 2002 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021